|
|
|
| Guest Book (1934 Posts)
|
| Topic |
Guest Book |
|
|
|
On 3/10/2003 Longy
wrote in from
(213.48.nnn.nnn)
Cabbage? you talk about fags a lot, you trying to tell us something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/10/2003 dom-de-mars
wrote in from
(80.8.nnn.nnn)
http://www.notinournamemusic.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/9/2003
Antti S. Brax
wrote in from
(193.65.nnn.nnn)
Green and orange.
Always a joy to look at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/9/2003 hugh r
wrote in from
(205.216.nnn.nnn)
Not skateboarding... but something that doesn't come around everyday... at least not around here... HR
Poppy pics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/8/2003
AKABO
wrote in from
(62.56.nnn.nnn)
ASABA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/7/2003 Bro Carlson
wrote in from
(216.65.nnn.nnn)
My brother todcar races slalom regularly. We both started skating in the early seventies. Wood decks with x-caliber trucks and open bearing wheels. The ups guy was our favorite, because in Michigan everything came from CA ups. No empty pools or drainage ditches,no giant pipes in the desert. Just the occasional hill or architectural anomoly to skate on. We LIVED for our next Skateboarders Mag. to be delivered. To see Alva,Peralta,Hester,the Logans and so many others ripping in territory so unfamiliar to us was daunting and yet inspiring.
And now when I log on to this website, I hear so much non skate related crap.
Yeah, exercise your right to free speech. But do it in the correct forum.
Dubya and saddam don't give a %$*! about you when you're skating. Give yourself the same power! Skate all you #%$*&^# dogs.....SKATE!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/7/2003 SillyBilly
wrote in from
(64.12.nnn.nnn)
Please control yourself when your "envy"of certain people makes you lose touch with reality. Dont hate because you cant skate........Go Arab!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/6/2003
cabbage
wrote in from
(216.83.nnn.nnn)
see that banner right over this post? that is my son,(Skye) who has not seen his father (me) since his first b-day, and he is gonna be 3 this July...
let me tell you there is a little boy that doesn't know his father at all, and might never, and no one loses more then him. I would quit sk8ing tomarrow for good to find him, and s$#@ I would even coach his all star team, or help him get to that level. If you wanna shoot me, open invite, I'll be a Kona sk8park June 13th....look forward to meeting you there, hope you can make it...
so get over it, and go sk8 you fag's..............
shut up and sk8,
cabbage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/6/2003 cabbage
wrote in from
(216.83.nnn.nnn)
Dude those last 2 post are weak...I can't believe you would go there..... fag............get a life....
shut up and sk8
cabbage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/2/2003
snoball
wrote in from
(65.32.nnn.nnn)
i've seen that list too Cliff...and i'm not really into the
args right now...but um, that list is a little misleading...
it's kind of an oversimplification to say that all bombs
are dropped for all the same reasons ( to create democracy..
which is, i think what the last paragraph there on
the list is insinuating? ) becasue they're not..for instance,
the bombing of Yugoslavia was not to create a democracy
but to try to stop a genocidal regime...and we didn't bomb
the Iraqi's to put a democracy into Kuwait but to drive
the Iraqi's out of it...and korea and china in the 50's wasn't for the same reasons as Guatamela...i mean, the
idea that american bombing is to create democracies makes
about as much sense as saying american exports are to
make pro-american consumers ( it doesn't work..there's lots
of KFC's for instance in the middle east..)..anyway, saying
that's a 'history test' under the generalization that
they were all bombed to create a democracy is totally inaccurate...
personally, i think the idea of bombing iraq to 'contain'
saddam is kinda silly...he's already contained and we
have far more imminent threats than himself...
no bombs at all, ever, anywhere, done by any government
would be great...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/2/2003 hugh r
wrote in from
(205.216.nnn.nnn)
Herbn... thanks for taking the time to read/respond to my uniform theory post. I was disenchanted at the time because it drew no responses!
While I do look deeper into things than to take them at their face value, there are certain very recognizable icons out there, that when they are used the surface level is so strong, that underline meanings pale. Most of these seem to mire themselves in calls of free speech or artistic expression.
The US Flag is such an icon... as is a red/white checkerd scarf on the head and an AK in the hands firing in the air. Now place that flag on fire in the midst of the rifle shooters and the message is pretty unmistakable.
Put the flag in the form of a diaper on a twisted man, and that message is unmistakable too.
While many times things are not as they seem to be... sometimes they are exactly what they look like.
Pretending something is different than it really is, is a deception. Doing it with an icon that is so unmistakable in it's meaning is even worse.
My two cents... HR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/2/2003
Cliff Coleman
wrote in from
(216.119.nnn.nnn)
Here is something for you hawks to think about.
Quick Political Scholastic Aptitude Test:
This test consists of one (1) multiple-choice question (so you better get
it right!) based on the following list of countries that the U.S. has
bombed since the end of World War II, compiled by historian William Blum:
China 1945-46
Korea 1950-53
China 1950-53
Guatemala 1954
Indonesia 1958
Cuba 1959-60
Guatemala 1960
Congo 1964
Peru 1965
Laos 1964-73
Vietnam 1961-73
Cambodia 1969-70
Guatemala 1967-69
Grenada 1983
Libya 1986
El Salvador 1980s
Nicaragua 1980s
Panama 1989
Iraq 1991-99
Sudan 1998
Afghanistan 1998, 2001-2002
Yugoslavia 1999
------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
In how many of these instances did a democratic government, respectful of
human rights, occur as a direct result? Choose one of the following:
(a) 0
(b) zero
(c) none
(d) not a one
(e) a whole number between -1 and +1
This quiz compliments of Vietnam Veterans Against the War,
Ben Chitty USN 65-9 VN 66-7 68 NY/VVAW
peaceCENTER
P.O. Box 36, San Antonio, Texas 78291
(210) 224-HOPE or 224-4673 FAX (210) 222-1097
Scary!
Cliff Coleman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/2/2003 herbn
wrote in from
(152.163.nnn.nnn)
I read back, quite a way back, didn't realize the reading was so good here ,or maybe it's a rainy sunday and i havn't gotten over to my workshop yet to press that new board.I've been told the civil war was economics, in the south ,due to climate and the nature of the business it was cheaper to house and feed slaves, in the north it's cheaper to pay a minimum wage and let the workers go out and house and feed themselves, there was no moral high road. Essentially the north needed freed black slaves to come up north and work in factories.
Enter "the Hugh theory of uniforms", very tue,but, a uniform can have SO many different or subtle interpretations ,it's so subjective, and rarely anonymous and literal. Ex. the really rich guy who dresses down , like the rock star who buys jeans with preworn holes in the legs, the homo that parodys a cop or a woman...Is skin color part of a uniform? So ,with a life time of many contradictory "uniform" experiences , we all develope a uniform deciphering system , did you really think that flamboyant motorccycle cop was a real cop:) and someone who sees an apparrent uniform and immediately comes up with a long list unflapable assumptions that "have to be true",well do you do that? ,You could start with apparent things like skin color, i hope not. By the way the assumptions are not the bad part,they could be uncontrollable ,ingrained since childhood, it's the inflexibility that you can control. Take my interpretation of Mr PVD's 666.At first, sign of the devil,since i don't believe in that stuff, but if he does it's negative. what else has he done, he's made trucks,he's mechanicly minded ,scientific, intellegent,ect ect,this is not catching someone spray painting 666 on the side of your garage over an animal sacrifice. Do what you want, the uniform thing is just to superficial, it might be very true, but at the same time it's not that simple ,it shouldn't be and if you check yourself you'll hopefully find that you don't interprete uniforms all that literally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3/1/2003
salami mustapha
wrote in from
(213.136.nnn.nnn)
i need your email contacts so that i can email you for business purposes.
thanks for co-operation
kindest regards
salami mustapha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/22/2003
LA COSTA BOYS RACING
wrote in from
(152.163.nnn.nnn)
Is this the slalom forum?What are you cyber geeks on? Way too much time on your hands I'd say..
May I suggest this being a Saturday that you so called racers get off your laptops,grab some cones,and run some gates. Who knows, you might even improve your skate skills.What a concept huh?I'm going back to the hill.....See you all in Elsinore.SHERMAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/20/2003 Is it magic?
wrote in from
(165.134.nnn.nnn)
Watching "Joe Millionaire" was almost unbePoofle;
Minnesota black dirt is Poofle; some styles of undershorts are more wePoofle than others. ScPoof beetles are heavy-bodied, oval, often brightly colored or iridescent insects that live in North Africa. Would Bill Dance recommend a mPoofou jig for crappie?
Nothin' up my sleeve...PRESTO!!!
(Just foolin' around)
:-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/19/2003 DT
wrote in from
(66.27.nnn.nnn)
Hey Chris - forget Harleys.
Old Indians Never Die!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/19/2003 h0dad
wrote in from
(202.37.nnn.nnn)
h0dad's parents were evil NCOs (how they met and married, aint that sweet) as were their parents before them..a proud history, but kinda innoculated the h0dad, who (while respecting the culture eg. peacekeepers in timor etc) doesnt respect authority enough to cut that mustard;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/19/2003 Longy
wrote in from
(62.31.nnn.nnn)
well put it this way..the new officer dudes we always got from other companies or via sandhurst were always taken on "Moms country amble" which was a 7 mile full kit assault course by evil NCO's who would beat them with riot sticks when they fell over and cried for "mom"...kind of showed them who was top banana :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/18/2003 brian
wrote in from
(67.250.nnn.nnn)
longy,
i'm not military, but i think you got a point. there's no way in hell i'd trust my life to the rotc kooks runnin' around on my campus, and they're just months away from 'leadership' as officers. ever talked to those guys? wow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/16/2003
Rene' Carrasco
wrote in from
(66.81.nnn.nnn)
Frank Merelos,
...I think I know who you are.....you used to win those nose wheelie contests at Brookhurst "CRATER" Park- back in the 1970's....?
..................- Rene' Carrasco.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/15/2003 Frank Merelos
wrote in from
(205.188.nnn.nnn)
AKA (Sad) Are you a dork or what!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/13/2003 longy
wrote in from
(62.31.nnn.nnn)
....how about officers make vital decisions which will get people killed which are then ignored by NCO's who nod furiously then give the grunts a proper thought out strategy and command system.....NCO's are the backbone of any regular army..listening to officers gets you killed :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/12/2003
Antti S. Brax
wrote in from
(193.65.nnn.nnn)
Army doesn't work like that. If the troops start making decisions they get killed. Officers make decisions and troops implement them. That is the sole purpose of basic training. To condition the men to act when told.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 2/12/2003 george g.
wrote in from
(159.87.nnn.nnn)
sorry,got a little memoried away there... at any rate if we are as a nation are going to put troops on the ground, let no man be his judge. the man holding the rifle gets to make the decision on whether his target, a human, is eliminated or not. don't set up some kind of parameters. if we are not willing to do that we should not be there. look for another solution. because it costs a lot and i don't mean money. i' m done.
|
|
|
|
|
